Thursday 20 February 2014

Course Curriculum

Module 3 has played a significant role in the development of my teaching practice and ideas. My independent research, during the planning of my course, led me to the investigation of the praxis, process and hidden curriculum models, which ultimately led me to question our current education system, purpose and context, subject hierarchy and my role as a teacher. I focused on critical and emancipatory pedagogies as well as equality and diversity ideology to enhance the incorporation of inclusivity. The process of creating my course enabled me to understand further what kind of teacher I wanted to be as I analysed my position in teaching, the way I chose to encourage learning and the change in my values. My main influences were: Michael Apple, Paulo Freire, Ken Robinson and Dr Christine Rose. Like myself, they all reject structures such as selective, narrative and banking education. However, I was disappointed with the way in which education seemed to be shifting away from curriculums such as process and praxis, and becoming more focused on the product model. Curriculum should aim to create expressive, creative individuals with the skills, knowledge and criticality needed to make a difference and equip them for life. I reflected on my teaching and role as a teacher:

I analysed the way in which I encouraged my students to engage and learn. I noticed that I moved away from my original purpose for coming into teaching and got caught up in the pressure to perform as a teacher. Within this pressure there was a growing need to provide evidence of ‘good’ teaching. Module three enabled me to revaluate my role. I wanted to adopt ideas from the above theorists and incorporate them into my teaching but I found that the current climate in education meant that my efforts were aspirational or difficult to achieve because of my lack of experience. In accordance to the implementation to ICT, I found myself wanting to take a step back from the age of information. I think that like all things it has its advantages and disadvantages, however, I do not think it is a vital element in producing an Ofsted grade one. In my case, teaching media is ICT heavy but I find it frustrating that learners have used ICT or rather the Internet as their sole method of research so I have made it compulsory for learners to include references to books in their writing.

Further Reading: 

Apple. W M (2004) Ideology and Curriculum (3rd edn). RoutledgeFalmer, New York and London
Freire. P (2003) ‘From Pedagogy of the Oppressed’ In: Darder. A, Baltodano. M, Torres. D.R. ed. The Critical Pedagogy Reader. RoutledgeFalmer: New York, London
Freire. P (1972) Cultural Action for Freedom, Penguin education. Penguin, Harmondsworth
Rose. C (2010) Embedding E&D within Curriculum Planning and Teaching and Learning Delivery – Guide by Dr Christine Rose distributed at City and Islington College Professional Development Day 9th July 2010
TED (2006) Ken Robinson: How Schools Kill Creativity, February 2006. Viewed 21 March 2014. Access online: https://www.ted.com/talks/ken_robinson_says_schools_kill_creativity